Supreme Court

Appellants:State of Kerala Vs. Respondent:Joseph Antony: Decided On: 02.11.1993 — by admin — last modified 2007-11-05 14:19

Equivalent Citation: AIR1994SC721, 1994(1)KLT904(SC), 1993(4)SCALE326, (1994)1SCC301, [1993]Supp3SCR531

Appellants: Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action Vs. Respondent: Union of India (UOI) and Ors. Decided On: 18.04.1996 — by admin — last modified 2007-11-05 14:24

Equivalent Citation: 1996IIIAD(SC)641, JT1996(4)SC263, 1996(3)SCALE579, (1996)5SCC281, [1996]Supp1SCR507

Appellants:S. Jagannath Vs. Respondent: Union of India and others: Decided On: 11.12.1996 — by admin — last modified 2007-11-05 15:56

Equivalent Citation: AIR1997SC811, 1997(1)Crimes189(SC), JT1997(1)SC160, 1997(5)SCALE406, (1997)2SCC87, [1996]Supp9SCR848

Appellants:Goa Foundation, Goa Vs. Respondent:Diksha Holdings Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. :Decided On: 13.01.2000 — by admin — last modified 2007-11-05 16:05

Equivalent Citation: 2000(1)SCALE407a, [2000]Supp4SCR502, 2001(1)UJ97(SC)

S. Jagannath v Union of India [1997] 2 SCC 87 — by admin — last modified 2007-11-10 14:32

 

M. Nizamudeen v. Chemplast Samnar Limited & Ors. :Decided On 10.03.2010 — by admin — last modified 2010-10-30 12:22

Ratio Decidendi: “If exception has been added to remedy the mischief or defect, it should be so construed that remedies the mischief and not in a manner which frustrates the very purpose.”

Goan Real Estate & Construction Ltd. and Anr. vs. Union of India through Secretary, Minister of Environment & Ors.:Decided On 31.3.2010 — by admin — last modified 2010-10-30 12:25

Ratio Decidendi: “Judgment in form of directions to the Central Government and other authorities cannot be read as a statute.”