Search:
Introduction | About Us | Legal Queries | Forums | Events | Campaigns | FAQ's | Contact Us | Home
CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE IS ONLY FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSE
You are here: Home Environmental Protection Case Laws Supreme Court Democratic Youth Federation of India Vs.Respondent: Union of India (UOI) and Ors.
TRADE AND ENVIRONMENT
 
Document Actions

Democratic Youth Federation of India Vs.Respondent: Union of India (UOI) and Ors.

by admin last modified 2011-11-10 17:23

NLS/ENVIS/13.05.2011/Environment/The Supreme Court of India.

ENVIRONMENT AND EFFECTS OF ENDOSULFAN
 
 
 
 
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
 
Appellants: Democratic Youth Federation of India
Vs.
Respondent: Union of India (UOI) and Ors.
Hon'ble Judges: S. H. Kapadia, C.J.,K. S. PanickerRadhakrishnan and Swatanter Kumar, JJ.
NLS/ENVIS/13.05.2011/Environment/The Supreme Court of India.
JUDGEMENT:
A Writ Petition is moved in public interest highlighting the harmful effects caused by the continued use of Endosulfan on human beings and on the environment Endosulfan is now used as a pesticide for the production of crops like paddy, sugarcane, cotton, mango, cashew etc. Few studies have been conducted in this area and its adverse effects on human health and environment has been reported. Some of the studies also indicate that Endosulfan is significantly associated with Neuro- behavioral disorders, Cognitive disorders, Hydrocephalus, Mental Retardation, Cortical blindness, Seizure disorders, Parkinson's disease etc. Petitioner submits that it is a serious health hazard and the Court has got an obligation to protect human life, which is guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Further, it was pointed out that its ill-effects have been clearly felt in the State of Kerala and its use has been completely banned in that State. We have gone through the report published by the Government of Kerala and the photographs appearing therein are highly disturbing. Right to life, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, is the most fundamental of all human rights, and any decision affecting human life, or which may put an individual's life at risk, must call for the most anxious scrutiny.
Learned Solicitor General of India referred to the various reports and the findings recorded therein on the use of Endosulfan. After referring to those reports the court is of the opinion that a detailed study on all India basis needs to be undertaken by an Expert Committee, so that its ill-effects on human health and environment can be better addressed.
The court appoints a Joint Committee headed by the Director General of ICMR and the Commissioner (Agriculture) to conduct a scientific study on the question whether the use of Endosulfan would cause any serious health hazard to human beings and would cause environmental pollution.
The Committee can also co-opt experts from the field of environment as well as public health and also other allied areas. The Committee would submit its interim report within eight weeks from today and also would suggest any alternative to Endosulfan. Till the report is submitted, keeping in mind the various judgments of this Court under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, particularly keeping in mind the precautionary principle, the court passes an ad-interim order to immediate ban the production, use and sale of Endosulfan all over India and we further direct the statutory authorities to seize the permit given to the manufacturers of Endosulfan till further orders.